You are receiving this pop-up because this is the first time you are visiting our site. If you keep getting this message, please enable cookies in your browser.
You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).
As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site. Thanks!
You are receiving this pop-up because this is the first time you are visiting our site. If you keep getting this message, please enable cookies in your browser.
35% energy savings with diffused glass and LED in tomatoes
During last month's Energiek Event, GreenQ Improvement Centre and the IDC of the WUR allowed visitors to take a look at trials in tomato cultivation, which seek to save 35% in electricity with LED lighting.
Bright, SON-T LED vs diffuse LED-LED
Last year, the WUR performed trials with diffused glass and hybrid lighting, bright gas and hybrid lighting and clear glass with SON-T lighting. It showed that lighting with single LED can be successful, provided extra heat is introduced.
In the present experiment, two greenhouses are compared. One greenhouse is equipped with SON-T masthead light, LED inter lighting and clear glass. The second greenhouse is equipped with LED masthead light, LED inter lighting and diffused glass.
37% energy saving
Currently, a 37% consumption of electricity was achieved, but 25% more heat was used. The LED LED greenhouse showed about 8% light loss; a combination of diffuse glass and shorter lighting time. Normally, 1% light loss is usually equal to 1% less yield. The LED LED greenhouse 8% less light resulted in only 5% less production.