- Sales Manager / Director - West Coast primary, USA
- Medewerker productmanagement support - Bleiswijk
- Head grower & Indoor farming-/hydroponic specialist - Küssnacht am Rigi, Switzerland
- Technical Director - Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Onderzoekassistent Fenotyperen - Bleiswijk
- Horticultural Soil Sales Representative - USA
- Turnkey Vegetable Greenhouse Sales Representative - USA
- Sales Administrator - Europe Division
- Junior Sales Manager - Europe Division
- Head Grower - Avoine, France
Top 5 -yesterday
- "We will supply 2 million kg of fresh produce to the UAE market in 2021"
- Investors perception: “Cute millennials with a container farm”
- It all started with two teenagers and one invention
- Modern 'dude ranch' uses solar greenhouse to help wounded vets and their families
- Is it possible to cut lettuce in just one second?
Top 5 -last week
Top 5 -last month
- “If we really want to make a change, we should intensively invest in innovation and technique in Africa”
- "Algorithm predicted irrigation need much better than I can with 38 years experience"
- "The sheer size of this pepper greenhouse makes it a remarkable project"
- Increasing yield, while improving plant quality and driving down energy costs
- Get your copy of the Greenhouse Guide
US: What is the most efficient source of electricity?
The true cost of electricity is difficult to pin down. That’s because a number of inputs comprise it: the cost of fuel itself, the cost of production, as well as the cost of dealing with the damage that fuel does to the environment.
Energy Points, a company that does energy analysis for business, factors in the these myriad values in terms of what percentage of the energy input—fossil fuel energy, plus energy for production and energy for environmental mitigation—will become usable electricity.
The chart above shows that fossil fuels yield, on a national average, only a portion of their original energy when converted into electricity. That’s because they are fossil fuels that require other fossil fuels to make the conversion into electricity; their emissions, such as carbon dioxide, also require a lot of energy to be mitigated. Renewables, however, have energy sources that aren’t fossil fuel and their only other energy inputs are production and mitigating the waste from that production. That actually results in more energy produced than fossil fuels put in. Wind, the most efficient fuel for electricity, creates 1164% of its original energy inputs when converted into electricity; on the other end of the efficiency spectrum, coal retains just 29% of its original energy.
These are national averages, meaning that, for example, solar might be more efficient in a place such as Arizona with lots of infrastructure and direct sunlight than it is across the whole nation.
In any given area, electricity might come from a number of different sources, including oil, coal, gas, wind, hydropower and solar. Each has its own set of costs, both internal and external. From Energy Points:
Energy Points’ methodology measures environmental externalities and calculates the energy it takes to mitigate them. For example, it quantifies the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that result from turning coal and natural gas into electricity and then calculates the energy it would take to mitigate those emissions through carbon capture and sequestration. Water scarcity and contamination are quantified as the energy that is required to durably supply water to that area. And in the case of solar or wind energy, Energy Points incorporates the life cycle impact of manufacturing and shipping the panels.
This metric is a more rounded calculation than merely cost or carbon footprint. For example, hydro electricity has the lowest carbon footprint (4 gCO2/kWh), but when Energy Points factors in the full lifecycle of the different fuels, wind is the most efficient. Additionally, natural gas is the cheapest fuel to produce electricity, according to levilized cost data from the Environmental Protection Agency, which measured the total cost of building and operating a generating plant over an assumed financial life and duty cycle. Though it’s cheap, it’s not very efficient if you factor in its production and emissions.
Correction: Hydro electricity has the lowest carbon footprint of 4 gCO2/kWh, an earlier version of this post said the number was 4 kgCO2/kWh.
Receive the daily newsletter in your email for free | Click here
Other news in this sector:
- 2020-09-22 Nepal: Salarhi District exports vegetables worth Rs 3 billion
- 2020-09-22 Bad weather and labour shortages push Kuala Lumpur vegetable prices
- 2020-09-22 India: Vegetable prices spike in Hyderabad
- 2020-09-22 AU (QLD): Seasonal worker funding package welcomed
- 2020-09-22 Hillwood Berries optimistic after promise of seasonal workers
- 2020-09-22 New consumer trends are boosting the demand for aromatic herbs
- 2020-09-22 New Zealand: Horticulture supported through immigration changes
- 2020-09-22 Bayer opens application window for Grants4Ag
- 2020-09-22 H2020 Agri-Tech Project, DEMETER, announces 1st Open Call for Innovative Solutions
- 2020-09-22 Rwanda exports 305.6 tons of fresh products in week 38
- 2020-09-22 Bad air quality from California fires causes labor challenges
- 2020-09-22 Southwestern Ontario: Vegetable growers not too optimistic
- 2020-09-22 US: Administration rolls out $14 Billion CFAP 2.0 program for farmers
- 2020-09-21 'Corona - learn to play outside again'
- 2020-09-21 Brightseed closed $27M in growth financing
- 2020-09-21 Horticulture might guide Kenya's economic rebound from COVID
- 2020-09-21 Cucumbers and courgettes confirm a positive trend despite a slight drop in prices
- 2020-09-21 CAN (BC): Better protection for foreign workers
- 2020-09-21 "New USDA Coronavirus aid offers partial improvement for producers"
- 2020-09-21 Spain: Unsatisfactory results in fruit and vegetables exports