




Announcements
Vacancies
- Technical Sales Representative, Leamington, Ontario
- Technical Sales Representative, Ancaster, Ontario
- HR Generalist
- Head Grower Strawberries (West Virginia USA)
- Global Sourcing Manager
- Buying Operations Manager (BOM Process)
- Sourcing Manager EU
- Manager Operations Ethiopia
- Senior Grower
- Propagation Specialist
"Tweeting Growers"
Top 5 - yesterday
Top 5 - last week
Top 5 - last month
- "Vertical solar panels under the gutter can provide significant savings in plastic greenhouses"
- The differences between greenhouse growers in US and Canada
- German grower reduces moisture in slabs with Spacer
- Half the labor if tomato grows upside down?
- China: Abundance of crops grow in arid Xinjiang desert
Agrochemicals' benefit to human health and the environment
This year marks the 50th anniversary of biologist Rachel Carson’s 1962 book, Silent Spring, which argued that man-made chemicals represented a grave threat to human health and the environment. Using harsh and unscientific rhetoric—which was rebuked in the journal Science magazine shortly after its publication—Carson postulated that man-made chemicals affect processes of the human body in “sinister and often deadly ways.”
History has proven Carson’s claims wrong. Contrary to her admonitions, a chemically caused cancer epidemic never came to pass. Researchers who identified environmental factors did not simply target trace chemical exposures as significant, but instead focused on major cancer causes such as tobacco and poor diets. In fact, people are living longer and healthier lives, cancer rates have declined even as chemical use has increased, and chemicals are not among the key causes of cancer.
As the world reexamines Carson’s anti-pesticide legacy, this paper focuses on the importance of chemicals designed for crop production. These agrochemicals represent a subset of the many technologies and practices designed to promote high-yield farming— making it possible for farmers to increase food production per acre. Other technologies include biotechnology, better soil and water management, among other things. Policies that allow strategic development and application of such tools will continue to facilitate the Green Revolution and increase agriculture’s ability to feed the world’s growing population. In addition, high-yield agriculture reduces the amount of land necessary to meet those needs, thereby providing more land for conservation and biodiversity. The adverse impacts of pesticides on human health and the environment are often greatly exaggerated and history shows that these risks can be managed to ensure substantial net benefits.
Unfortunately, these benefits are at risk as Carson’s legacy of misinformation lives on within the politically organized environmental movement. Green activists oppose strategic pesticide spraying to control deadly diseases like the West Nile virus and advocate “organic farming” using “natural chemicals,” even though there is little evidence that organic farming makes food any healthier. As a result, regulatory trends around the world have supplanted wise management with heavy regulations and product bans. The cost and risks associated with bureaucratic regulations alone dampens the market for innovative new products, diminishes the supply of pest control options for farmers, and reduces their efficiency. The result is lower food production, higher food prices, and fewer environmental benefits.
Related Files: Angela Logomasini - Rachel Was Wrong.pdf
History has proven Carson’s claims wrong. Contrary to her admonitions, a chemically caused cancer epidemic never came to pass. Researchers who identified environmental factors did not simply target trace chemical exposures as significant, but instead focused on major cancer causes such as tobacco and poor diets. In fact, people are living longer and healthier lives, cancer rates have declined even as chemical use has increased, and chemicals are not among the key causes of cancer.
As the world reexamines Carson’s anti-pesticide legacy, this paper focuses on the importance of chemicals designed for crop production. These agrochemicals represent a subset of the many technologies and practices designed to promote high-yield farming— making it possible for farmers to increase food production per acre. Other technologies include biotechnology, better soil and water management, among other things. Policies that allow strategic development and application of such tools will continue to facilitate the Green Revolution and increase agriculture’s ability to feed the world’s growing population. In addition, high-yield agriculture reduces the amount of land necessary to meet those needs, thereby providing more land for conservation and biodiversity. The adverse impacts of pesticides on human health and the environment are often greatly exaggerated and history shows that these risks can be managed to ensure substantial net benefits.
Unfortunately, these benefits are at risk as Carson’s legacy of misinformation lives on within the politically organized environmental movement. Green activists oppose strategic pesticide spraying to control deadly diseases like the West Nile virus and advocate “organic farming” using “natural chemicals,” even though there is little evidence that organic farming makes food any healthier. As a result, regulatory trends around the world have supplanted wise management with heavy regulations and product bans. The cost and risks associated with bureaucratic regulations alone dampens the market for innovative new products, diminishes the supply of pest control options for farmers, and reduces their efficiency. The result is lower food production, higher food prices, and fewer environmental benefits.
Related Files: Angela Logomasini - Rachel Was Wrong.pdf
Publication date:
Receive the daily newsletter in your email for free | Click here
Other news in this sector:
- 2023-06-02 How to control the microbiome in soilless cultivation?
- 2023-05-30 Cheaper fertilizer is a relief for Australian farmers
- 2023-05-26 Fertilizer affordability starts to improve after two turbulent years
- 2023-05-25 NL: WUR is investigating alternative sources for phosphate
- 2023-05-24 $11.7 million allocated to the African Fertilizer Financing Mechanism
- 2023-05-24 Yara to build new plant for specialty fertilizers and biostimulants
- 2023-05-03 CAN (ON): Ontario awards funding to bring alternative fertilizers to the market
- 2023-05-03 Ensuring proper fertilizer concentration in greenhouse growing
- 2023-05-02 Are microbes the future of fertilizer?
- 2023-04-28 Yara results down because of declining market prices
- 2023-04-24 How to calculate fertilizer rates?
- 2023-04-20 Plant vaccines delivered via microneedle could offer alternative to chemical spraying
- 2023-04-19 A greater yield with fewer inputs and a focus on local growers
- 2023-04-17 What unique benefits do plants get from biofungicide and mycorrhizae?
- 2023-04-17 Fungal biofertilizer can boost cucumber crop health
- 2023-04-13 New bio-fertilizers and stimulants on the Spanish market
- 2023-04-12 Autonomous spraying robots arrive in Israel and Spain
- 2023-04-12 Strawberry grower keeps up with demand thanks to fertilizer
- 2023-04-07 Griffin adds Hortus USA products to US and Canada portfolio
- 2023-03-31 Rovensa Next’s Biimore receives additional crops approval under EU Fertilizing products regulation