Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

Indoor farming patent doesn't impress Philips

Is a patent on indoor or vertical farming possible? Well, according to Philips not. Despite Plantlab's claim to have a patent on growing in a completely closed and controlled environment, Philips Lighting will continue with its activities in indoor farming. 

Last week, Plantlab announced that it can obtain its patent on indoor farming, described by the company as a 'closed plant nursery system'. Plantlab claims that it has invented the way how you can control the plants growth by influencing the rootzone and leaf temperature in vertical farming. Since 2008, the company has been defending this patent at the European Patent Office (EPO), with Philips Lighting and Certhon as their major opponents. 

According to Plantlab, the EPO decided that their patent can be sustained. But the opponents Philips and Certhon doubt this. 

"The verdict or decision of the European Patent Office (EPO) on June 21 Juni 2017 does not concern any products or systems from Philips Lighting", says Philips Lighting in a response. For this reason, the LED manufacturer will continue with their activities related to horticultural, indoor, vertical and city farming systems. 

"As a support to our customers, we are involved in this case and we doubt the patent from Plantlab in regards to the control of rootzone and leaf temperature in vertical farming. Philips Lighting awaits a formal, written statement of the European Patent Office, before we will undertake any steps, such as an appeal against the verdict."