Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

Fairy tales of white light – Does white LED light give better growing results?

The horticultural lighting market is in constant movement, and it’s getting harder and harder for a grower to find reliable product information and independent research results. One specific myth continues to live its life year after year – that is the debate over white LED light, which is considered to give better-growing results. We break the myth and help you to evaluate lighting properly.

Research on light is one-sided – Consider growing conditions as a whole
Did you know that most research conducted on the effects of light on plants is in fact funded by companies manufacturing horticultural lighting? Case studies which compare only light quality, whilst other growing conditions are kept the same, are also problematic. Growth is a complex process and light is only one part of it. Different spectrum requires different growing environment: temperatures, humidity, fertigation.

When white light is compared to red and blue-based light at the same photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD), but growing temperatures are kept the same, white light usually gives better-growing results. But not because it would have better spectrum, but because it has lower efficacy and bigger amount of electricity is turned directly into heat. This makes the micro-climate for plants different from red and blue light, thus giving better results. Red and blue light need higher growing temperature, and when other growing conditions are tuned for spectrum, red and blue give better results than white light.

In a closed growing environment, without sunlight, some white light should be added to enable certain processes for green light to start in a plant. But only a small fracture of the total light amount is needed. There is a scientific basis on this. Plants cannot use most of the green light – which white light includes a lot – thus it’s reflected from the leaves. Human eye sees this rejected reflection as the green colour of the leaves. Plants use red and blue wavelengths for photosynthesis.

White LED chips lack efficiency – Invest in red and blue spectrum
Development in LED chip efficiency has been remarkably fast during the past few years. But in efficiency, white LED chips always stay behind red and blue chips. Why? Because white is not a primary colour, but a mix. White LED chips are manufactured by covering blue chip with some fluorescent matter that creates white spectrum. And covering primary light source never gives as much light.

But why some suppliers campaign for white light? Companies with a background in general lighting have a goal: let´s sell general lighting also to horticulture. Let's save time and money consuming R&D and forget highly efficient, but pricier horticultural red and blue LED chips. But in commercial growing, it’s more profitable to invest in efficiency with certain red and blue spectrum. Research and some special plants are a different case, however.

For more information 
Netled Oy
Niko Kivioja
T: +358-50-360-8121
niko.kivioja@netled.fi
www.netled.fi 

Publication date: