Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber
IFOAM:

"CAP deal lacks strong and credible steps towards sustainability"

The Irish EU Presidency, European Parliament and Commission negotiators reached an agreement on the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) 2014-2020. The IFOAM EU Group has strongly criticised (1) the lack of ambition set out in the final settlement. While greening has been established as an idea, the deal does not provide the necessary shift towards greener and fairer farming and rural communities.

“The introduction of Pillar 1 greening is just the first step to steer direct payments towards better practices – but the obligations are far too weak! While the recognition of organic farms as ‘green by definition’ is a good step to acknowledge their pioneering role in sustainability (3), the agreement also includes a questionable equivalence principle and exemptions for low-level agri-environmental practices which empty the greening of all substance,” said Christopher Stopes, IFOAM EU Group President. “The deal is also far from providing fairness amongst farmers, as convergence of CAP payments still remains insufficient.”

“We welcome that at least 30% of the Pillar 2 budget will be allocated to measures that for the most part contribute to enhanced environmental performance, however this is not progress but a continuation of the status quo” added Jan Plagge, IFOAM EU Farmer Sector Group Chairman. "The few positive moves – such as increased investment support connected to organic farming and agri-environment-climate schemes, a clear message that new Innovation Partnerships must support a transition to agro-ecological approaches, and the introduction of an extra article governing support schemes for organic farming – can only have an impact if there is significant funding allocated to Pillar 2. The possibility for Member States to spend major parts of the budget for insurance schemes and other measures without any positive impact on sustainability further undermines the potential for Pillar 2 to promote the shift towards sustainable farming."

“Good CAP implementation at regional and national level could partially salvage the attempt to green the CAP,” concluded Thomas Fertl, IFOAM EU Group Vice President. “Over the coming months organic farmers and citizens must push countries and regions to make the best use of the new and existing tools by:

Implementing clear and strict greening requirements under Pillar 1 that do not hamper additional strong Pillar 2 pillar measures for advanced sustainability

Using the option to shift up to 15% of national CAP budgets from Pillar 1 to Pillar 2 (modulation, article 14.1)

Dedicating more than 50% of the Pillar 2 budget to measures that promote advanced sustainability (organic farming and agri-environment-climate)

Prioritising agro-ecological approaches including organic farming across rural development programmes” (4).


More information:
IFOAM EU Group, phone + 32-2-280 12 23, Fax: +32-2-735 73 81,
[email protected], www.ifoam-eu.org
Publication date: