Announcements

Job offersmore »



Tweeting Growers

Top 5 - yesterday

  • No news has been published yesterday.

Top 5 - last week

Top 5 - last month

Exchange ratesmore »




Effect of plant species, fertilizer on soilless root substrate pH

The objective of this study was to determine how plant species, fertilizer potential acidity/basicity rating (PABR), and fertilizer concentration affect root substrate pH. Three experiments were conducted.

In the first experiment, 13 herbaceous species were grown in a root substrate of three sphagnum peatmoss: one perlite (v/v) with deionized water and a neutral fertilizer (NF) with a PABR of 0 for 78 days to determine species relationships to substrate pH. The decrease in substrate pH ranged from 0.14 to 2.45 units, depending on species.

In the second experiment, four of the 13 species from the previous trial representing the range of pH suppression were grown under similar growth conditions as the first experiment for 70 days. Substrate pH was lowered in the range of 0.47 to 2.72 units.

In the third experiment, three fertilizers with PABRs of 150 kgt−1 CaCO3 equivalent alkalinity, 0 neutral, and 193 kgt−1 CaCO3 equivalent acidity were applied in a factorial design at 100 and 200 mgL−1 N at each irrigation to kalanchoe (the species with the greatest pH suppression from the previous experiments) for 56 days.

When applied at the lower fertilizer rate (100 mgL−1 N), the PABRs resulted in the final substrate pH levels of 4.68, 5.60, and 6.11 for the acidic fertilizer (AF), NF, and basic fertilizer (BF), respectively. At the high fertilizer rate (200 mgL−1 N), substrate pH declined continuously to 3.97, 4.03, and 4.92 for the AF, NF, and BF, respectively.

Expression of PABR depended on the balance between the abiotic (chemical) effect of the fertilizers vs. the biotic (physiological) effects of the fertilizers on microbes and plants. The PABR was best expressed when the fertilizer supply was just adequate or lower indicating a closer connection to the biotic effect.

Access the full study at HortScience

Publication date: 1/6/2017

 


 

Other news in this sector:

5/19/2017 Dutch Plantin tests emission of water and fertilizers
5/17/2017 Hydroponic media: Give slab production a second look
5/15/2017 UK: New growing media blends to reduce reliance on coir
5/11/2017 "Not every new product is an innovation"
5/4/2017 Higher yields with new free draining coir substrate
4/19/2017 Soilless technology takes root in blueberry cultivation
3/30/2017 "Growers rediscover cocopeat substrates"
3/24/2017 Different types of limestone to increase substrate pH
3/20/2017 Cocogreen launches coir product selector
3/14/2017 Growing demand for OMRI listed coco substrate
2/21/2017 Grodan once again awarded EU Ecolabel
2/20/2017 New biodegradable bioplastics to increase crop yields
2/8/2017 Carbon Gold brings enriched biochar to Dutch market
2/7/2017 Spain: Projar water retention analysis service grows by 30%
2/6/2017 Greenyard's Oliver Grunert obtains PhD on Grow Bag research
2/3/2017 Freshfel in cooperation with Growing Media Europe
1/26/2017 Florentaise: off to a good start in China
1/19/2017 What is biochar?
1/9/2017 "Double layered bag has been a game changer"
1/9/2017 Advancements in microgreens growing by Grow-Tech